Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] xprtrmda: Report address of frmr, not mw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Aug 29, 2016, at 3:54 PM, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> On 08/23/2016 01:54 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Tie frwr debugging messages together by always reporting the address
>> of the frwr.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c |    9 +++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
>> index e82d5cf..2e51ef5 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
>> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ __frwr_reset_mr(struct rpcrdma_ia *ia, struct rpcrdma_mw *r)
>> 		return PTR_ERR(f->fr_mr);
>> 	}
>> 
>> -	dprintk("RPC:       %s: recovered FRMR %p\n", __func__, r);
>> +	dprintk("RPC:       %s: recovered FRMR %p\n", __func__, f);
>> 	f->fr_state = FRMR_IS_INVALID;
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ frwr_op_map(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, struct rpcrdma_mr_seg *seg,
>> 		goto out_mapmr_err;
>> 
>> 	dprintk("RPC:       %s: Using frmr %p to map %u segments (%u bytes)\n",
>> -		__func__, mw, mw->mw_nents, mr->length);
>> +		__func__, frmr, mw->mw_nents, mr->length);
>> 
>> 	key = (u8)(mr->rkey & 0x000000FF);
>> 	ib_update_fast_reg_key(mr, ++key);
>> @@ -450,6 +450,9 @@ __frwr_prepare_linv_wr(struct rpcrdma_mw *mw)
>> 	struct rpcrdma_frmr *f = &mw->frmr;
>> 	struct ib_send_wr *invalidate_wr;
>> 
>> +	dprintk("RPC:       %s: invalidating frmr %p\n",
>> +		__func__, f);
>> +
> 
> Any reason this is broken into two lines?

No. It can be re-arranged.


>> 	f->fr_state = FRMR_IS_INVALID;
>> 	invalidate_wr = &f->fr_invwr;
>> 
>> @@ -532,6 +535,8 @@ frwr_op_unmap_sync(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, struct rpcrdma_req *req)
>> 	 */
>> unmap:
>> 	list_for_each_entry_safe(mw, tmp, &req->rl_registered, mw_list) {
>> +		dprintk("RPC:       %s: unmapping frmr %p\n",
>> +			__func__, &mw->frmr);
> 
> Same question here.

On one line, the dprintk invocation is longer than 80 characters.
Just avoiding a checkpatch.pl complaint.


> Thanks,
> Anna
>> 		list_del_init(&mw->mw_list);
>> 		ib_dma_unmap_sg(ia->ri_device,
>> 				mw->mw_sg, mw->mw_nents, mw->mw_dir);
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Chuck Lever



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux