Two patches for recently discussed functionality.
Both revert earlier patches and provide a more complete
solution.
The first adds a new program. I've placed this in "systemd/" rather
than "utils/something" because that seemed to make sense. Is it
inelegant putting code in a directory with unit files?
I don't do a lot of automake coding so if someone were to make sure I
didn't do anything non-standard in the Makefile.am, that would be
appreciated.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
---
NeilBrown (2):
systemd: improve ordering between nfs-server and various mounts
mount: RPC_PROGNOTREGISTERED should not be a permanent error
systemd/Makefile.am | 8 ++
systemd/nfs-server-generator.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
systemd/nfs-server.service | 3 -
utils/mount/stropts.c | 7 +-
4 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 systemd/nfs-server-generator.c
--
Signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
