[RFC PATCH] nfsd: fix error handling for clients that fail to return the layout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently, when the client fails to return the layout we'll eventually
give up trying but leave the layout in place. What we really need to
do here is fence the client in this case. Have it fall through to that
code in that case instead of into the NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT case.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Note that this patch is untested, other than for compilation as I
don't have a block/scsi pnfs setup on which to do so. Still, I think
it makes more sense to fence clients that don't return the layout
instead of just giving up.

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
index 42aace4fc4c8..596205d939a1 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c
@@ -686,10 +686,6 @@ nfsd4_cb_layout_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct rpc_task *task)
 			return 0;
 		}
 		/* Fallthrough */
-	case -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT:
-		trace_layout_recall_done(&ls->ls_stid.sc_stateid);
-		task->tk_status = 0;
-		return 1;
 	default:
 		/*
 		 * Unknown error or non-responding client, we'll need to fence.
@@ -702,6 +698,10 @@ nfsd4_cb_layout_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct rpc_task *task)
 		else
 			nfsd4_cb_layout_fail(ls);
 		return -1;
+	case -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT:
+		trace_layout_recall_done(&ls->ls_stid.sc_stateid);
+		task->tk_status = 0;
+		return 1;
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux