Hi Christoph, On 07/28/2016 10:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:18:02AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Now that 207 is fixed the next test starts failing.. 285 is >> the SEEK_HOLE/DATA sanity check, which might help with figuring out >> which of the recent changes introduced it. > > A week later this still fails with the linux-next branch. Plain NFSv4.2 > against a Linux/XFS server. The 285.full file documenting the failures > is attached below: > What mount options are you using? The test passes for me on xfs, btrfs, and ext4. Thanks, Anna -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
