Re: Lost CLOSE with NFSv4.1 on RHEL7 ( and bejond?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tigran

Can you test with an upstream kernel? Olga has seen issues around no CLOSE being sent - it is really hard to reproduce….

—>Andy


> On Jul 7, 2016, at 6:49 AM, Mkrtchyan, Tigran <tigran.mkrtchyan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Dear NFS folks,
> 
> we observe orphan open-states on our deployment with nfsv4.1.
> Our setup - two client nodes, running RHEL-7.2 with kernel
> 3.10.0-327.22.2.el7.x86_64. Both nodes running ownCloud (like
> a dropbox) which nfsv4.1 mounts to dCache storage. Some clients
> connected to node1, others to node2.
> 
> Time-to-time we see some 'active' transfers on data our DS
> which do nothing. There is a corresponding state on MDS.
> 
> I have traced one one such cases:
> 
>  - node1 uploads the file.
>  - node2 reads the file couple of times, OPEN+LAYOUTGET+CLOSE
>  - node2 sends OPEN+LAYOUTGET
>  - there is no open file on node2 which points to it.
>  - CLOSE never send to the server. 
>  - node1 eventually removes the removes the file
> 
> We have many other cases where file is not removed, but this one I was
> able to trace. The link to capture files:
> 
> https://desycloud.desy.de/index.php/s/YldowcRzTGJeLbN
> 
> We had ~ 10^6 transfers in last 2 days and 29 files in such state (~0.0029%).
> 
> Tigran.

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w���jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux