(sorry for resend, the first go around did not make it to fsdevel and to Al).
This is inspired by a bug in Lustre that's ATM is shared by NFS
and used o be shared by CIFS code.
The problem at hand is: when you try to mkdir in a directory
where you do not have permissions to create anything, you only
supposed to get EPERM if the directory you are creatign does not exist.
Now if the name does exist, you are supposed to get EEXIST instead.
There are tons of programs that when fed a pathname go and try
to perform a create of every path component starting from /,
and ignoring EEXIST, but not other errors. Those programs are broken
by the above mentioned bug.
All is fine everywhere by Lustre and NFS at the moment, because
there's an optimization at hand. e.g. in NFS:
/*
* If we're doing an exclusive create, optimize away the lookup
* but don't hash the dentry.
*/
if (nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, flags))
return NULL;
Now, this is all fine except when you have no permissions to create
anything - then vfs_mknod/mkdir/create will do may_create(dir, dentry)
and we exit spuriously with EPERM.
[green@fedora1 crash]$ mkdir aaa
mkdir: cannot create directory 'aaa': Permission denied
[green@fedora1 crash]$ mkdir lost+found
mkdir: cannot create directory 'lost+found': Permission denied
[green@fedora1 crash]$ ls -ld lost+found
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 May 25 2013 lost+found
[green@fedora1 crash]$ mkdir lost+found
mkdir: cannot create directory 'lost+found': File exists
cifs had exactly the same code, but it got removed when atomic_open
was introduced (throwing away a perfectly good optimization for mkdir
in process) with commit d2c127197dfc0b2bae62a52e1e0d3e3ff493919e
"cifs: implement i_op->atomic_open()"
These two patches are the lazy way of fixing the problem -
"just throw in the extra permission check before bailing out"
with a bit of complication on the NFS side because there
the inode permission check is actually circumvented in nfs_permission,
for MAY_WRITE | !MAY_READ case which is enough to fool
may_create, but not enough to fool some following check, I guess
as the problem still exists.
(I am not sure of the performance implications of just removing that
thing in nfs_permission).
Anyway I think instead of resurrecting this optimization for cifs,
and seeing if ceph and others need it, why not bring it up
all the way to __lookup_hash() so that we don't do actual lookup
if the parent is writeable?
Even for local filesystems like ext4 that's of benefit - we save
one lookup (even with hashed dirs, that only gives us the last blook
to lookat and then we still need to check all names to make sure
the one we want does not exist - so it's not exactly free).
This should not upset any sort of client-side SELinux/other security
stuff magic either. If the name exists, we get EEXIST no matter what,
if it does not exist, parent policy declares if we can create or not
anyway.
Something like this (+ whatever nfs_permission fix):
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 70580ab..b9de645 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1512,6 +1512,10 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(const struct qstr *name,
if (unlikely(!dentry))
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ if ((flags & LOOKUP_EXCL|LOOKUP_CREATE) &&
+ (may_create(base, dentry) == 0))
+ return dentry;
+
return lookup_real(base->d_inode, dentry, flags);
}
Comments?
Oleg Drokin (2):
nfs: Fix spurios EPERM when mkdir of existing dentry
staging/lustre: Prevent spurious EPERM on mkdir
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/namei.c | 8 ++++++--
fs/nfs/dir.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
