This patch still crashes for me.
[ 183.814855] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88001b18cfe8
[ 183.815403] IP: [<ffffffff81381b63>] nfs_update_inode+0x53/0xa30
[ 183.815868] PGD 3580067 PUD 3581067 PMD 77f69067 PTE 800000001b18c060
[ 183.816640] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 183.817252] Modules linked in: loop rpcsec_gss_krb5 joydev acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis virtio_console tpm i2c_piix4 pcspkr nfsd ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops virtio_blk serio_raw drm floppy
[ 183.820203] CPU: 6 PID: 40935 Comm: rm Not tainted 4.7.0-rc3-vm-nfst+ #6
[ 183.820818] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 183.821329] task: ffff88001b430c80 ti: ffff88001cf2c000 task.ti: ffff88001cf2c000
[ 183.822223] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81381b63>] [<ffffffff81381b63>] nfs_update_inode+0x53/0xa30
[ 183.823007] RSP: 0018:ffff88001cf2fb08 EFLAGS: 00010283
[ 183.823417] RAX: ffff88001b18d000 RBX: ffff880021b582a8 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 183.823845] RDX: ffff88001b18d000 RSI: ffff88001c3cdf00 RDI: ffff880021b582a8
[ 183.824276] RBP: ffff88001cf2fb58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 183.824701] R10: ffff88001b430c80 R11: 00000000fffe3818 R12: ffff88001c3cdf00
[ 183.825190] R13: ffff88001c3cdf00 R14: ffff88001c3cdf00 R15: 0000000000000001
[ 183.825651] FS: 00007fa0e9c5b700(0000) GS:ffff880075200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 183.826396] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 183.826884] CR2: ffff88001b18cfe8 CR3: 000000001bc1f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[ 183.827460] Stack:
[ 183.827825] ffff880000000000 ffff88001cf2fb58 0000000000000246 ffffffff81382f33
[ 183.828734] 0000000000000246 ffff880021b582a8 ffff880021b582a8 ffff88001c3cdf00
[ 183.829634] ffff88001c3cdf00 0000000000000001 ffff88001cf2fb80 ffffffff81382aa1
[ 183.830562] Call Trace:
[ 183.830938] [<ffffffff81382f33>] ? nfs_refresh_inode.part.24+0x23/0x50
[ 183.831368] [<ffffffff81382aa1>] nfs_refresh_inode_locked+0x71/0x4e0
[ 183.831785] [<ffffffff81382f3e>] nfs_refresh_inode.part.24+0x2e/0x50
[ 183.832209] [<ffffffff81384024>] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0x314/0x4b0
[ 183.832632] [<ffffffff8137c6fe>] nfs_do_access+0x47e/0x620
[ 183.833036] [<ffffffff8137c2d1>] ? nfs_do_access+0x51/0x620
[ 183.833456] [<ffffffff818507ea>] ? generic_lookup_cred+0x1a/0x20
[ 183.833872] [<ffffffff8184ef7e>] ? rpcauth_lookupcred+0x8e/0xd0
[ 183.834288] [<ffffffff8137cb69>] nfs_permission+0x289/0x2e0
[ 183.834699] [<ffffffff8137c943>] ? nfs_permission+0x63/0x2e0
[ 183.835108] [<ffffffff812768da>] __inode_permission+0x6a/0xb0
[ 183.835521] [<ffffffff81276934>] inode_permission+0x14/0x50
[ 183.835928] [<ffffffff8127b2cf>] link_path_walk+0x2ef/0x6b0
[ 183.837327] [<ffffffff8127b6a9>] ? path_parentat+0x19/0x80
[ 183.837988] [<ffffffff8127b6be>] path_parentat+0x2e/0x80
[ 183.838653] [<ffffffff8127cb13>] filename_parentat+0xb3/0x190
[ 183.839328] [<ffffffff8123bc4c>] ? cache_alloc_debugcheck_after.isra.52+0x19c/0x1f0
[ 183.840533] [<ffffffff8123e0a0>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x300/0x3d0
[ 183.841217] [<ffffffff8127c89f>] ? getname_flags+0x4f/0x1f0
[ 183.841888] [<ffffffff810e6d0d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 183.842570] [<ffffffff8127d455>] do_unlinkat+0x65/0x2f0
[ 183.843243] [<ffffffff8100201a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 183.843910] [<ffffffff8127e17b>] SyS_unlinkat+0x1b/0x30
[ 183.844582] [<ffffffff8188aebc>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbd
(gdb) l *(nfs_update_inode+0x53)
0xffffffff81381b63 is in nfs_update_inode (/home/green/bk/linux-test/fs/nfs/inode.c:1233).
1228 * being placed at the head of the list.
1229 * See nfs_inode_attach_open_context()
1230 */
1231 return (list_first_entry(&nfsi->open_files,
1232 struct nfs_open_context,
1233 list)->mode & FMODE_WRITE) == FMODE_WRITE;
1234 }
1235
1236 static unsigned long nfs_wcc_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
1237 {
Reverting it makes the crash go away.
But there's also this other problem that I have not tracked to a particular patch yet:
[ 25.830288] =============================================
[ 25.830468] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 25.830658] 4.7.0-rc3-vm-nfst+ #8 Not tainted
[ 25.830822] ---------------------------------------------
[ 25.831009] cat/6588 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 25.831179] (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff813841f4>] __nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x124/0x3e0
[ 25.832488]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 25.833214] (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81388b7e>] nfs_start_io_read+0x1e/0x50
[ 25.834209]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 25.834970] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 25.835699] CPU0
[ 25.836077] ----
[ 25.836459] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13);
[ 25.836988] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13);
[ 25.837636]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 25.838749] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 25.839489] 1 lock held by cat/6588:
[ 25.839878] #0: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81388b7e>] nfs_start_io_read+0x1e/0x50
[ 25.840931]
stack backtrace:
[ 25.841645] CPU: 0 PID: 6588 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.7.0-rc3-vm-nfst+ #8
[ 25.842074] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 25.842497] 0000000000000086 00000000d8302202 ffff8800908c7c50 ffffffff814a0835
[ 25.843418] ffffffff82c82ac0 ffff880091890c80 ffff8800908c7d20 ffffffff810e7786
[ 25.844354] ffff8800908c7d28 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff8257be00
[ 25.845271] Call Trace:
[ 25.845653] [<ffffffff814a0835>] dump_stack+0x86/0xc1
[ 25.846068] [<ffffffff810e7786>] __lock_acquire+0x726/0x1210
[ 25.846519] [<ffffffff8104a425>] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x25/0x40
[ 25.846941] [<ffffffff8101f6f9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[ 25.847358] [<ffffffff813841bc>] ? __nfs_revalidate_mapping+0xec/0x3e0
[ 25.847787] [<ffffffff8104a425>] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x25/0x40
[ 25.848210] [<ffffffff8101f6f9>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
[ 25.848630] [<ffffffff810e86de>] lock_acquire+0xfe/0x1f0
[ 25.849046] [<ffffffff813841f4>] ? __nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x124/0x3e0
[ 25.849503] [<ffffffff818884aa>] down_write+0x5a/0xc0
[ 25.849919] [<ffffffff813841f4>] ? __nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x124/0x3e0
[ 25.850355] [<ffffffff813841f4>] __nfs_revalidate_mapping+0x124/0x3e0
[ 25.850781] [<ffffffff81384b53>] nfs_revalidate_mapping_protected+0x13/0x20
[ 25.851214] [<ffffffff8137f587>] nfs_file_read+0x47/0xc0
[ 25.851636] [<ffffffff8126a3f5>] __vfs_read+0xe5/0x150
[ 25.852051] [<ffffffff8126b569>] vfs_read+0x99/0x140
[ 25.852485] [<ffffffff8126cab8>] SyS_read+0x58/0xc0
[ 25.852892] [<ffffffff8188adbc>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbd
On Jun 21, 2016, at 5:34 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Unless the user is using file locking, we must assume close-to-open
> cache consistency when the file is open for writing. Adjust the
> caching algorithm so that it does not clear the cache on out-of-order
> writes and/or attribute revalidations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/file.c | 13 ++-----------
> fs/nfs/inode.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
> index 717a8d6af52d..2d39d9f9da7d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
> @@ -780,11 +780,6 @@ do_unlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
> }
>
> static int
> -is_time_granular(struct timespec *ts) {
> - return ((ts->tv_sec == 0) && (ts->tv_nsec <= 1000));
> -}
> -
> -static int
> do_setlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
> {
> struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
> @@ -817,12 +812,8 @@ do_setlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl, int is_local)
> * This makes locking act as a cache coherency point.
> */
> nfs_sync_mapping(filp->f_mapping);
> - if (!NFS_PROTO(inode)->have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ)) {
> - if (is_time_granular(&NFS_SERVER(inode)->time_delta))
> - __nfs_revalidate_inode(NFS_SERVER(inode), inode);
> - else
> - nfs_zap_caches(inode);
> - }
> + if (!NFS_PROTO(inode)->have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ))
> + nfs_zap_mapping(inode, filp->f_mapping);
> out:
> return status;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index 60051e62d3f1..bd0390da3344 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -878,7 +878,10 @@ void nfs_inode_attach_open_context(struct nfs_open_context *ctx)
> struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
>
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> - list_add(&ctx->list, &nfsi->open_files);
> + if (ctx->mode & FMODE_WRITE)
> + list_add(&ctx->list, &nfsi->open_files);
> + else
> + list_add_tail(&ctx->list, &nfsi->open_files);
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_inode_attach_open_context);
> @@ -1215,6 +1218,21 @@ int nfs_revalidate_mapping_protected(struct inode *inode, struct address_space *
> return __nfs_revalidate_mapping(inode, mapping, true);
> }
>
> +static bool nfs_file_has_writers(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
> +{
> + assert_spin_locked(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> +
> + if (list_empty(&nfsi->open_files))
> + return false;
> + /* Note: This relies on nfsi->open_files being ordered with writers
> + * being placed at the head of the list.
> + * See nfs_inode_attach_open_context()
> + */
> + return (list_first_entry(&nfsi->open_files,
> + struct nfs_open_context,
> + list)->mode & FMODE_WRITE) == FMODE_WRITE;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long nfs_wcc_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> {
> struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
> @@ -1279,22 +1297,24 @@ static int nfs_check_inode_attributes(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fat
> if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_TYPE) && (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (fattr->mode & S_IFMT))
> return -EIO;
>
> - if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_CHANGE) != 0 &&
> - inode->i_version != fattr->change_attr)
> - invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
> + if (!nfs_file_has_writers(nfsi)) {
> + /* Verify a few of the more important attributes */
> + if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_CHANGE) != 0 && inode->i_version != fattr->change_attr)
> + invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR | NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
>
> - /* Verify a few of the more important attributes */
> - if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_MTIME) && !timespec_equal(&inode->i_mtime, &fattr->mtime))
> - invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
> + if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_MTIME) && !timespec_equal(&inode->i_mtime, &fattr->mtime))
> + invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
>
> - if (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_SIZE) {
> - cur_size = i_size_read(inode);
> - new_isize = nfs_size_to_loff_t(fattr->size);
> - if (cur_size != new_isize)
> - invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
> + if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_CTIME) && !timespec_equal(&inode->i_ctime, &fattr->ctime))
> + invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
> +
> + if (fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_SIZE) {
> + cur_size = i_size_read(inode);
> + new_isize = nfs_size_to_loff_t(fattr->size);
> + if (cur_size != new_isize)
> + invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
> + }
> }
> - if (nfsi->nrequests != 0)
> - invalid &= ~NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
>
> /* Have any file permissions changed? */
> if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_MODE) && (inode->i_mode & S_IALLUGO) != (fattr->mode & S_IALLUGO))
> @@ -1526,7 +1546,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_refresh_inode);
>
> static int nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> {
> - unsigned long invalid = NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE;
> + unsigned long invalid = NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR;
>
> /*
> * Don't revalidate the pagecache if we hold a delegation, but do
> @@ -1675,6 +1695,7 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> unsigned long invalid = 0;
> unsigned long now = jiffies;
> unsigned long save_cache_validity;
> + bool have_writers = nfs_file_has_writers(nfsi);
> bool cache_revalidated = true;
>
> dfprintk(VFS, "NFS: %s(%s/%lu fh_crc=0x%08x ct=%d info=0x%x)\n",
> @@ -1730,7 +1751,7 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> dprintk("NFS: change_attr change on server for file %s/%ld\n",
> inode->i_sb->s_id, inode->i_ino);
> /* Could it be a race with writeback? */
> - if (nfsi->nrequests == 0) {
> + if (!have_writers) {
> invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR
> | NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA
> | NFS_INO_INVALID_ACCESS
> @@ -1770,9 +1791,10 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> if (new_isize != cur_isize) {
> /* Do we perhaps have any outstanding writes, or has
> * the file grown beyond our last write? */
> - if ((nfsi->nrequests == 0) || new_isize > cur_isize) {
> + if (nfsi->nrequests == 0 || new_isize > cur_isize) {
> i_size_write(inode, new_isize);
> - invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
> + if (!have_writers)
> + invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;
> }
> dprintk("NFS: isize change on server for file %s/%ld "
> "(%Ld to %Ld)\n",
> --
> 2.5.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
