On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Sagi Grimberg <sagigrim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I am able to reproduce the Local Protection Errors with >> this patch applied and SLUB debugging disabled. > Thanks Chuck for proving that the dma alignment is not the issue here. > > I suggest that we go with my dma coherent patch for now until Leon and > the Mellanox team can debug this one with the HW/FW folks and find out > what is going on. > > Leon, I had my share of debugging this area on mlx4/mlx5 areas. If you > want I can help with debugging this one. Hi Sagi, Leon and Co, >From quick reading of the patch I got the impression that some scheme which used to work is now broken, did we get a bisection result pointing to the upstream commit which introduce the regression? I didn't see such note along the thread, basically, I think this is where we should be starting, thoughts? I also added the mlx4 core/IB maintainer. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
