On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:10:33AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > >>>On Jun 15, 2016, at 12:28 AM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:15:25PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > >>>>From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>>kmalloc doesn't guarantee the returned memory is all on one page. > >>> > >>>IMHO, the patch posted by Christoph at that thread is best way to go, > >>>because you changed streaming DMA mappings to be coherent DMA mappings [1]. > >>> > >>>"The kernel developers recommend the use of streaming mappings over > >>>coherent mappings whenever possible" [1]. > >>> > >>>[1] http://www.makelinux.net/ldd3/chp-15-sect-4 > >> > >>Hi Leon- > >> > >>I'll happily drop this patch from my 4.8 series as soon > >>as an official mlx4/mlx5 fix is merged. > >> > >>Meanwhile, I notice some unexplained instability (driver > >>resets, list corruption, and so on) when I test NFS/RDMA > >>without this patch included. So it is attached to the > >>series for anyone with mlx4 who wants to pull my topic > >>branch and try it out. > > > >hi Chuck, > > > >We plan to send attached patch during our second round of fixes for > >mlx4/mlx5 and would be grateful to you if you could provide your > >Tested-by tag before. > > First of all, IIRC the patch author was Christoph wasn't he. Do you think that author's name can provide different results in verification/bug reproduction? We didn't send this patch officially yet and all relevant authors will be acknowledged and honored when the official (second round of IB fixes) will come. > > Plus, you do realize that this patch makes the pages allocation > in granularity of pages. In systems with a large page size this > is completely redundant, it might even be harmful as the storage > ULPs need lots of MRs. I see proper execution of the driver as an important goal which goes before various micro optimizations, which will come after. id you ask yourself, why are not so many users use that ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN? ➜ linux-rdma git:(master) grep -rI ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN drivers/* drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/mr.c: add_size = max_t(int, MLX4_MR_PAGES_ALIGN - ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, 0); drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c: add_size = max_t(int, MLX5_UMR_ALIGN - ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN, 0); drivers/md/dm-crypt.c: ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN); drivers/usb/core/buffer.c: * ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN. drivers/usb/core/buffer.c: if (ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN <= 32) drivers/usb/core/buffer.c: else if (ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN <= 64) drivers/usb/core/buffer.c: else if (ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN <= 128) drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c: return (unsigned long)buf & (ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN - 1); > > Also, I don't see how that solves the issue, I'm not sure I even > understand the issue. Do you? Were you able to reproduce it? Yes, the issue is that address supplied to dma_map_single wasn't aligned to DMA cacheline size. And as the one, who wrote this code for mlx5, it will be great if you can give me a pointer. Why did you chose to use MLX5_UMR_ALIGN in that function? This will add 2048 bytes instead of 64 for mlx4. > > IFF the pages buffer end not being aligned to a cacheline is problematic > then why not extent it to end in a cacheline? Why in the next full page? It will fit in one page. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
