Re: [PATCH 06/12] NFS: Don't hold the inode lock across fsync()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:47:55PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >But we need something to lock out new callers of inode_dio_end
> >when calling inode_dio_wait.  Then again the current code already
> >fails to to do that..
> 
> We could do that by setting the I/O mode to buffered; that still allows
> parallelism  for the buffered I/O case. I wouldn???t normally expect
> applications that use O_DIRECT on NFS to call fsync(), since we always enforce O_DIRECT|O_SYNC semantics.

Maybe not applications specificly written for NFS.  But if you're using
for example qemu on O_DIRECT without O_SYNC and lots of fdatasync calls
will be the default behavior.

Anyway, as per the other thread we might be able to get rid of the
inode_dio_wait call entirely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux