> But...suppose we have two racing OPEN calls. They're both in > nfs4_get_vfs_file. One opens the file and succeeds and the other fails > and ends up in out_put_access. At that point, you could end up > clobbering the successful update to st_access_bmap from the other task, > and we'd end up not putting the file access references in > release_all_access. Pondering further (with an assumption about the workload), isn't this path also likely to involve a lease break in progress on that file? Thanks, Andy -- Andrew W. Elble aweits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Infrastructure Engineer, Communications Technical Lead Rochester Institute of Technology PGP: BFAD 8461 4CCF DC95 DA2C B0EB 965B 082E 863E C912 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
