J. Bruce Fields wrote: > Hm. Are there some missing includes, maybe?: > > In file included from include/linux/hashtable.h:12:0, > from fs/btrfs/props.c:19: > include/linux/hash.h: In function `hash_64_genericâ': > include/linux/hash.h:76:3: error: implicit declaration of function `BUILD_BUG_ON' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > BUILD_BUG_ON(bits > 32 || bits == 0); > ^ Ooh, excellent catch! That's a paper-bag mistake. Thank you for saving me from Linus's wrath. (My lame explanation: "make allyesconfig" is annoyingly slow, and that error was an afterthought I added after the "real work" parts. Do you think that check should even be in there?) #include <linux/bug.h> and try again, or re-pull... Oh, bugger, that revealed something else that scrolled past in previous builds. I'll push when I've fixed this one, too.. drivers/base/power/trace.c defines its own static hash_string() function *and* includes <limux/dcache.h>, leading to conflicting declarations. Which one to rename...? Anyway, much obliged! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
