On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 19:50 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > On 5/14/16, 21:06, "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Currently, the code will clear the fail bit if we get back a fatal > >error. I don't think that's correct -- we only want to clear that > >bit if the layoutget succeeds. > > > >Fixes: 0bcbf039f6 (nfs: handle request add failure properly) > >Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c > >index e6cad5ee5d29..5f6ed295acb5 100644 > >--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c > >+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c > >@@ -876,11 +876,13 @@ send_layoutget(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, > > lseg = nfs4_proc_layoutget(lgp, gfp_flags); > > } while (lseg == ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN)); > > > >- if (IS_ERR(lseg) && !nfs_error_is_fatal(PTR_ERR(lseg))) > >- lseg = NULL; > >- else > >+ if (IS_ERR(lseg)) { > >+ if (!nfs_error_is_fatal(PTR_ERR(lseg))) > >+ lseg = NULL; > >+ } else { > > pnfs_layout_clear_fail_bit(lo, > > pnfs_iomode_to_fail_bit(range->iomode)); > >+ } > > No… The intention was indeed that we clear the fail bit in all cases > except fatal errors. Otherwise, the client won’t attempt another > layoutget. > Got it, thanks. Let me respin, retest and resend. Let me know if you see any other problems and I'll get those fixed before the next resend. Thanks! -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html