Re: parallel lookups on NFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 09:22:56AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> ...but looks like same problem:
> 
> (gdb) list *(__kmalloc_track_caller+0x96)
> 0xffffffff811f9a06 is in __kmalloc_track_caller (mm/slub.c:245).
> 240      *                      Core slab cache functions
> 241      *******************************************************************/
> 242
> 243     static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> 244     {
> 245             return *(void **)(object + s->offset);
> 246     }
> 247
> 248     static void prefetch_freepointer(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> 249     {

Joy...  Does that happen without the last commit as well?  I realize that
memory corruption could well have been introduced earlier and changes in
the last commit had only increased the odds, but...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux