On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 08:31:54PM +0000, David Binderman wrote:
> [linux-4.4/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_mech.c:296]: (warning) Invalid test for overflow 'p+20<p'. Condition is always false unless there is overflow, and overflow is Undefined Behaviour.
>
> Source code is
>
> if (unlikely(p + 20> end || p + 20 < p)) {
Looks like we make that assumption all over; e.g. see the checks in
xdr_reserve_space and __xdr_inline_decode. I guess that should be
if (unlikely(end - p < 20))
?
What's the practical effect right now? (E.g. does gcc actually violate
our assumption here currently?)
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
