Re: [PATCH 1/4] locks: new locks_mandatory_area calling convention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:54:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 04:05:04AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > Where the hell would truncate(2) get struct file, anyway?  IOW, the inode
> > argument is _not_ pointless; re-added.
> 
> Oh, right.  Interestingly is seems like xfstests has no coverage of this
> code path at all.

LTP does (ftruncate04)...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux