On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:09:20AM -0800, santosh shilimkar wrote: > >I'd say drop the current iWarp transport if it's not testable. The > >only real difference between IB and iWarp is the needed to create > >a MR for the RDMA READ sink, and we're much better of adding that into > >the current IB transport if new iWarp users show up. > > Agree. I will probably do it along with RDS IB FR support in 4.6 Great news! Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
