On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 04:54:45PM -0500, Andrew W Elble wrote: > > > Is there some lock imbalance?: > > Hmmmm, I'll have to poke at that a bit. > > > When you send a v2 patch, would you mind also describing what's changed? > > If you stick the description here (between the --- and the diff), it'll > > be discarded when git applies the patch (which is what we want). > > Ah. In this case, v1 missed unlocking the rwsem if nfs4_upgrade_open() > returned status. OK. Just to make sure, I checked again, and I was indeed testing with your v2 (on top of some patches of my own which I'm fairly certain weren't the cause, but I'll double check that as well). --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
