On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would like to re-iterate, on both XFS and ext4, I _really_ think this > should be a ro_compat flag, and not an incompat one. If a person has the > ability to mount the FS (even if it's a read-only mount), then they by > definition have read access to the file or partition that the filesystem is > contained in, which means that any ACL's stored on the filesystem are > functionally irrelevant, It is unfortunately not safe to make such a file system accessible to other users, so the feature is not strictly read-only compatible. Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
