On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The issue is that revalidation may cause the dentry to be dropped in NFS
> if, say, the client notes that the directory timestamps have changed.
Ack.
We've had this bug before, where we returned something else than
-ENOCHLD while we were doing RCU lookups. See for example commit
97242f99a013 ("link_path_walk(): be careful when failing with
ENOTDIR").
So in general, we should always (a) either verify all sequence points
or (b) return -ENOCHLD to go into slow mode. The patch seems
However, this thing was explicitly made to be this way by commit
766c4cbfacd8 ("namei: d_is_negative() should be checked before ->d_seq
validation"), so while my gut feel is to consider this fix
ObviouslyCorrect(tm), I will delay it a bit in the hope to get an ACK
and comment from Al about the patch.
Al?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
