Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix a write performance regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu,  1 Oct 2015 19:12:26 -0400
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If all other conditions in nfs_can_extend_write() are met, and there
> are no locks, then we should be able to assume close-to-open semantics
> and the ability to extend our write to cover the whole page.
> 
> With this patch, the xfstests generic/074 test completes in 232s instead
> of >1400s on my test rig.
> 
> Fixes: bd61e0a9c852 ("locks: convert posix locks to file_lock_context")
> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/write.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> index 72624dc4a623..1d6f6b43b7f4 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> @@ -1223,7 +1223,7 @@ static int nfs_can_extend_write(struct file *file, struct page *page, struct ino
>  		return 1;
>  	if (!flctx || (list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_flock) &&
>  		       list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix)))
> -		return 0;
> +		return 1;
>  
>  	/* Check to see if there are whole file write locks */
>  	ret = 0;


Ouch -- mea culpa. Actually broken originally in
5263e31e452fb84138b9bee061d5c06c0f359fea, I think...

In any case:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux