On 9/23/2015 15:53, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> Hi Tao,
>
> I meet a panic with this patch on 4.3.0-rc2 from linus's tree every time,
The export is ,
/nfs/pnfs *(rw,insecure,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash,crossmnt,pnfs,fsid=0)
/nfs/pnfs is mounted an XFS filesystem which supports block layout.
thanks,
Kinglong Mee
>
> # mount -t nfs nfs-server:/ /mnt <------ a nfs4.2 mount
> # cat /mnt/test1
> # echo sdfsdijfd > /mnt/test2
> # umount /mnt <----- panic here
>
> [ 391.565636] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffe0
> [ 391.565667] IP: [<ffffffffa04fc019>] nfs4_delegreturn_prepare+0x19/0x70 [nfsv4]
> [ 391.565696] PGD 1c14067 PUD 1c16067 PMD 0
> [ 391.565711] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> [ 391.565721] Modules linked in: blocklayoutdriver(OE) nfsv4(OE) nfs(OE) fscache(E) xfs libcrc32c btrfs ppdev coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel nfsd xor raid6_pq vmw_balloon auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd parport_pc vmw_vmci parport shpchp i2c_piix4 grace sunrpc vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm serio_raw mptspi e1000 scsi_transport_spi mptscsih ata_generic mptbase pata_acpi [last unloaded: fscache]
> [ 391.567216] CPU: 0 PID: 498 Comm: kworker/0:1H Tainted: G OE 4.3.0-rc2+ #257
> [ 391.567672] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/02/2015
> [ 391.568586] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
> [ 391.569038] task: ffff8800362bc8c0 ti: ffff880075264000 task.ti: ffff880075264000
> [ 391.569505] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa04fc019>] [<ffffffffa04fc019>] nfs4_delegreturn_prepare+0x19/0x70 [nfsv4]
> [ 391.570441] RSP: 0018:ffff880075267cc0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> [ 391.570910] RAX: ffffffffa052e700 RBX: ffff880041235000 RCX: 0000000000000001
> [ 391.571379] RDX: ffff8800362bcfd0 RSI: ffff880041235000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> [ 391.571833] RBP: ffff880075267cd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000942000
> [ 391.572332] R10: ffff8800362bc8c0 R11: ffff880075267d78 R12: ffff880069da5600
> [ 391.572739] R13: ffff88007ff49d00 R14: ffffffffa00881b0 R15: ffff880069da5688
> [ 391.573142] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff81c29000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 391.573552] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 391.573964] CR2: ffffffffffffffe0 CR3: 0000000041095000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
> [ 391.574413] Stack:
> [ 391.574819] ffff880069da5600 ffffffffa00881b0 ffff880075267ce0 ffffffffa00881c3
> [ 391.575283] ffff880075267d48 ffffffffa0089e44 0000000000010000 ffff880069da5670
> [ 391.575711] 0000000000000292 ffffffff810a37fd 0000000100000000 00000000512aefa5
> [ 391.576137] Call Trace:
> [ 391.576560] [<ffffffffa00881b0>] ? __rpc_atrun+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
> [ 391.576996] [<ffffffffa00881c3>] rpc_prepare_task+0x13/0x20 [sunrpc]
> [ 391.577432] [<ffffffffa0089e44>] __rpc_execute+0x94/0x3f0 [sunrpc]
> [ 391.577919] [<ffffffff810a37fd>] ? process_one_work+0x16d/0x4c0
> [ 391.578521] [<ffffffffa008a1b5>] rpc_async_schedule+0x15/0x20 [sunrpc]
> [ 391.579180] [<ffffffff810a38ac>] process_one_work+0x21c/0x4c0
> [ 391.579886] [<ffffffff810a37fd>] ? process_one_work+0x16d/0x4c0
> [ 391.580495] [<ffffffff810a3b9a>] worker_thread+0x4a/0x440
> [ 391.581051] [<ffffffff810a3b50>] ? process_one_work+0x4c0/0x4c0
> [ 391.581484] [<ffffffff810a3b50>] ? process_one_work+0x4c0/0x4c0
> [ 391.581901] [<ffffffff810a8da5>] kthread+0xf5/0x110
> [ 391.582307] [<ffffffff810a8cb0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x240/0x240
> [ 391.582760] [<ffffffff8172d01f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
> [ 391.583152] [<ffffffff810a8cb0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x240/0x240
> [ 391.583584] Code: f5 75 e6 48 89 df e8 67 2f b8 ff eb dc 0f 1f 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 54 49 89 fc 53 48 8b be d8 01 00 00 48 89 f3 <48> 83 7f e0 00 74 11 4c 89 e6 e8 c8 df 02 00 84 c0 74 05 5b 41
> [ 391.584794] RIP [<ffffffffa04fc019>] nfs4_delegreturn_prepare+0x19/0x70 [nfsv4]
> [ 391.585186] RSP <ffff880075267cc0>
> [ 391.585561] CR2: ffffffffffffffe0
>
> thanks,
> Kinglong Mee
>
> On 9/22/2015 11:35, Peng Tao wrote:
>> If we send a layoutreturn asynchronously before close, the close
>> might reach server first and layoutreturn would fail with BADSTATEID
>> because there is nothing keeping the layout stateid alive.
>>
>> Also do not pretend sending layoutreturn if we are not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v2: grab lo refcount when doing ROC
>>
>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 7 +++++++
>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> index 693b903..05f2da4 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -2645,6 +2645,15 @@ out:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool
>> +nfs4_wait_on_layoutreturn(struct inode *inode, struct rpc_task *task)
>> +{
>> + if (!nfs_have_layout(inode))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return pnfs_wait_on_layoutreturn(inode, task);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct nfs4_closedata {
>> struct inode *inode;
>> struct nfs4_state *state;
>> @@ -2763,6 +2772,11 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>> goto out_no_action;
>> }
>>
>> + if (nfs4_wait_on_layoutreturn(inode, task)) {
>> + nfs_release_seqid(calldata->arg.seqid);
>> + goto out_wait;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0)
>> task->tk_msg.rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_CLOSE];
>> if (calldata->roc)
>> @@ -5308,6 +5322,9 @@ static void nfs4_delegreturn_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>>
>> d_data = (struct nfs4_delegreturndata *)data;
>>
>> + if (nfs4_wait_on_layoutreturn(d_data->inode, task))
>> + return;
>> +
>> if (d_data->roc)
>> pnfs_roc_get_barrier(d_data->inode, &d_data->roc_barrier);
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>> index ba12464..8abe271 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>> @@ -1104,20 +1104,15 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino)
>> mark_lseg_invalid(lseg, &tmp_list);
>> found = true;
>> }
>> - /* pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn() grabs lo ref and it will be put
>> - * in pnfs_roc_release(). We don't really send a layoutreturn but
>> - * still want others to view us like we are sending one!
>> - *
>> - * If pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn() fails, it means someone else is doing
>> - * LAYOUTRETURN, so we proceed like there are no layouts to return.
>> - *
>> - * ROC in three conditions:
>> + /* ROC in two conditions:
>> * 1. there are ROC lsegs
>> * 2. we don't send layoutreturn
>> - * 3. no others are sending layoutreturn
>> */
>> - if (found && !layoutreturn && pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn(lo))
>> + if (found && !layoutreturn) {
>> + /* lo ref dropped in pnfs_roc_release() */
>> + pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>> roc = true;
>> + }
>>
>> out_noroc:
>> spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>> @@ -1172,6 +1167,26 @@ void pnfs_roc_get_barrier(struct inode *ino, u32 *barrier)
>> spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>> }
>>
>> +bool pnfs_wait_on_layoutreturn(struct inode *ino, struct rpc_task *task)
>> +{
>> + struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
>> + struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
>> + bool sleep = false;
>> +
>> + /* we might not have grabbed lo reference. so need to check under
>> + * i_lock */
>> + spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
>> + lo = nfsi->layout;
>> + if (lo && test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags))
>> + sleep = true;
>> + spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>> +
>> + if (sleep)
>> + rpc_sleep_on(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
>> +
>> + return sleep;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Compare two layout segments for sorting into layout cache.
>> * We want to preferentially return RW over RO layouts, so ensure those
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>> index 78c9351..d1990e9 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
>> @@ -270,6 +270,7 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino);
>> void pnfs_roc_release(struct inode *ino);
>> void pnfs_roc_set_barrier(struct inode *ino, u32 barrier);
>> void pnfs_roc_get_barrier(struct inode *ino, u32 *barrier);
>> +bool pnfs_wait_on_layoutreturn(struct inode *ino, struct rpc_task *task);
>> void pnfs_set_layoutcommit(struct inode *, struct pnfs_layout_segment *, loff_t);
>> void pnfs_cleanup_layoutcommit(struct nfs4_layoutcommit_data *data);
>> int pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, bool sync);
>> @@ -639,6 +640,12 @@ pnfs_roc_get_barrier(struct inode *ino, u32 *barrier)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool
>> +pnfs_wait_on_layoutreturn(struct inode *ino, struct rpc_task *task)
>> +{
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline void set_pnfs_layoutdriver(struct nfs_server *s,
>> const struct nfs_fh *mntfh, u32 id)
>> {
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
