Re: [PATCH v1 00/24] New fast registration API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/22/2015 10:19 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:

As mentioned earlier, I have a WIP RDS fastreg branch [3]
which is functional (at least I can RDMA messages across
nodes ;-)).

Nice!

So merging [2] and [3], I created [4] and applied
a delta change based on your other patches. I saw ib_post_send
failure with my HCA driver returning '-EINVAL'. I didn't
debug it further but at least opcode and num_sge were set
correctly so I shouldn't have seen it. So I did memset()
on reg_wr which seems to have helped to fix the ib_post_send()
failure.

Yep - that was my fault. When converting the ULPs I optimized by
removing the memset but I forgot to set reg_wr.wr.next = NULL when
the ULP needed. This caused the driver to read a second bogus work
request. Steve just reported this as well so I'll fix that in v2.


But I got into remote access errors which tells me that I
have messed up setup(rkey, sge setup or access flags)

One thing that pops is that in the old API the MR was registered
with iova_start = 0 (which is probably what was sent to the peer),
but the new API the iova is implicitly sg_dma_address(&sg[0]).

The registered MR holds these attributes in:
mr->rkey
mr->iova
mr->length

These should be passed to a peer to perform rdma.

Hope this helps,
Sagi.

ohh, I just read the RDS 3.1 specification (for the first time..) and I
noticed that RDS 3.1 header extension contains only a 32bit offset
parameter. Why is that anyway? why not 64bit so it can be a valid mapped
address? Also the code doesn't use it at all and always passes 0 (which
is buggy if sg[0] has an offset from a page).

This won't work with the proposed API as the iova is 64bit (as all other
existing RDMA protocols use 64bit addresses).

In any event, I'd much rather to add ib_map_mr_sg_zbva() just for RDS
to use instead of polluting the API with an iova argument, but I think
that the RDS spec can be updated to use 64bit offsets and align to all
other RDMA protocols (it has enough space in h_exthdr which is 128bit).

I was thinking of:
diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
index e7e0251..61fcab4 100644
--- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
+++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
@@ -3033,6 +3033,21 @@ int ib_map_mr_sg(struct ib_mr *mr,
                 unsigned int sg_nents,
                 unsigned int page_size);

+static inline int
+ib_map_mr_sg_zbva(struct ib_mr *mr,
+                 struct scatterlist *sg,
+                 unsigned int sg_nents,
+                 unsigned int page_size)
+{
+       int rc;
+
+       rc = ib_map_mr_sg(mr, sg, sg_nents, page_size);
+       if (likely(!rc))
+               mr->iova &= ((u64)page_size - 1);
+
+       return rc;
+}
+
 int ib_sg_to_pages(struct ib_mr *mr,
                   struct scatterlist *sgl,
                   unsigned int sg_nents,
--

Thoughts?

Santosh, can you use that one instead and let us know if
it resolves your issue?

I think you should make sure to correctly construct the
h_exthdr with: rds_rdma_make_cookie(mr->rkey, (32)mr->iova)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux