On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 12:27:08PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > ACLs are considered equivalent to file modes if they only consist of > owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries, the owner@ permissions do not > depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group, and no > inheritance flags are set. This test is used to avoid storing richacls > if the acl can be computed from the file permission bits. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/richacl_base.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/richacl.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 105 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c > index 3163152..106e988 100644 > --- a/fs/richacl_base.c > +++ b/fs/richacl_base.c > @@ -379,3 +379,107 @@ richacl_chmod(struct richacl *acl, mode_t mode) > return clone; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_chmod); > + > +/** > + * richacl_equiv_mode - compute the mode equivalent of @acl > + * > + * An acl is considered equivalent to a file mode if it only consists of > + * owner@, group@, and everyone@ entries and the owner@ permissions do not > + * depend on whether the owner is a member in the owning group. > + */ > +int > +richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *acl, mode_t *mode_p) > +{ > + mode_t mode = *mode_p; > + > + /* > + * The RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD flag is meaningless for non-directories, so > + * we ignore it. > + */ > + unsigned int x = S_ISDIR(mode) ? 0 : RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD; > + struct { > + unsigned int allowed; > + unsigned int defined; /* allowed or denied */ > + } owner = { > + .defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | > + RICHACE_POSIX_OWNER_ALLOWED | x, > + }, group = { > + .defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | x, > + }, everyone = { > + .defined = RICHACE_POSIX_ALWAYS_ALLOWED | x, > + }; > + const struct richace *ace; > + > + if (acl->a_flags & ~(RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH | RICHACL_MASKED)) > + return -1; > + > + richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) { > + if (ace->e_flags & ~RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO) > + return -1; Couldn't this just be if (ace->e_flags != RICHACE_SPECIAL_WHO) return -1 I guess the only difference is that you're letting the named-user case through to get caught by the final "else" clause below.... Still, the != test seems possibly simpler to me. --b. > + > + if (richace_is_owner(ace) || richace_is_everyone(ace)) { > + x = ace->e_mask & ~owner.defined; > + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { > + unsigned int group_denied = > + group.defined & ~group.allowed; > + > + if (x & group_denied) > + return -1; > + owner.allowed |= x; > + } else /* if (richace_is_deny(ace)) */ { > + if (x & group.allowed) > + return -1; > + } > + owner.defined |= x; > + > + if (richace_is_everyone(ace)) { > + x = ace->e_mask; > + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) { > + group.allowed |= > + x & ~group.defined; > + everyone.allowed |= > + x & ~everyone.defined; > + } > + group.defined |= x; > + everyone.defined |= x; > + } > + } else if (richace_is_group(ace)) { > + x = ace->e_mask & ~group.defined; > + if (richace_is_allow(ace)) > + group.allowed |= x; > + group.defined |= x; > + } else > + return -1; > + } > + > + if (group.allowed & ~owner.defined) > + return -1; > + > + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) { > + if (acl->a_flags & RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH) { > + owner.allowed = acl->a_owner_mask; > + everyone.allowed = acl->a_other_mask; > + } else { > + owner.allowed &= acl->a_owner_mask; > + everyone.allowed &= acl->a_other_mask; > + } > + group.allowed &= acl->a_group_mask; > + } > + > + mode = (mode & ~S_IRWXUGO) | > + (richacl_mask_to_mode(owner.allowed) << 6) | > + (richacl_mask_to_mode(group.allowed) << 3) | > + richacl_mask_to_mode(everyone.allowed); > + > + /* Mask flags we can ignore */ > + x = S_ISDIR(mode) ? 0 : RICHACE_DELETE_CHILD; > + > + if (((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 6) ^ owner.allowed) & ~x) || > + ((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode >> 3) ^ group.allowed) & ~x) || > + ((richacl_mode_to_mask(mode) ^ everyone.allowed) & ~x)) > + return -1; > + > + *mode_p = mode; > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_equiv_mode); > diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h > index d4a576c..6535ce5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/richacl.h > +++ b/include/linux/richacl.h > @@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t); > extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int); > extern void richacl_compute_max_masks(struct richacl *); > extern struct richacl *richacl_chmod(struct richacl *, mode_t); > +extern int richacl_equiv_mode(const struct richacl *, mode_t *); > > /* richacl_inode.c */ > extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *, int); > -- > 2.4.3 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html