On 2015/09/11, 4:20 AM, "HPDD-discuss on behalf of Jeff Layton" <hpdd-discuss-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >With NFSv3 nfsd will always attempt to send along WCC data to the >client. This generally involves saving off the in-core inode information >prior to doing the operation on the given filehandle, and then issuing a >vfs_getattr to it after the op. > >Some filesystems (particularly clustered or networked ones) have an >expensive ->getattr inode operation. Atomicitiy is also often difficult >or impossible to guarantee on such filesystems. For those, we're best >off not trying to provide WCC information to the client at all, and to >simply allow it to poll for that information as needed with a GETATTR >RPC. > >This patch adds a new flags field to struct export_operations, and >defines a new EXPORT_OP_NOWCC flag that filesystems can use to indicate >that nfsd should not attempt to provide WCC info in NFSv3 replies. It >also adds a blurb about the new flags field and flag to the exporting >documentation. > >The server will also now skip collecting this information for NFSv2 as >well, since that info is never used there anyway. > >Note that this patch does not add this flag to any filesystem >export_operations structures. This was originally developed to allow >reexporting nfs via nfsd. That code is not (and may never be) suitable >for merging into mainline. > >Other filesystems may want to consider enabling this flag too. It's hard >to tell however which ones have export operations to enable export via >knfsd and which ones mostly rely on them for open-by-filehandle support, >so I'm leaving that up to the individual maintainers to decide. I am >cc'ing the relevant lists for those filesystems that I think may want to >consider adding this though. > >Cc: HPDD-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >Cc: fuse-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >--- > Documentation/filesystems/nfs/Exporting | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c | 5 ++++- > fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h | 5 ++++- > include/linux/exportfs.h | 2 ++ > 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/nfs/Exporting >b/Documentation/filesystems/nfs/Exporting >index 520a4becb75c..fa636cde3907 100644 >--- a/Documentation/filesystems/nfs/Exporting >+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/nfs/Exporting >@@ -138,6 +138,11 @@ struct which has the following members: > to find potential names, and matches inode numbers to find the >correct > match. > >+ flags >+ Some filesystems may need to be handled differently than others. The >+ export_operations struct also includes a flags field that allows the >+ filesystem to communicate such information to nfsd. See the Export >+ Operations Flags section below for more explanation. > > A filehandle fragment consists of an array of 1 or more 4byte words, > together with a one byte "type". >@@ -147,3 +152,25 @@ generated by encode_fh, in which case it will have >been padded with > nuls. Rather, the encode_fh routine should choose a "type" which > indicates the decode_fh how much of the filehandle is valid, and how > it should be interpreted. >+ >+Export Operations Flags >+----------------------- >+In addition to the operation vector pointers, struct export_operations >also >+contains a "flags" field that allows the filesystem to communicate to >nfsd >+that it may want to do things differently when dealing with it. The >+following flags are defined: >+ >+ EXPORT_OP_NOWCC >+ RFC 1813 recommends that servers always send weak cache consistency >+ (WCC) data to the client after each operation. The server should >+ atomically collect attributes about the inode, do an operation on it, >+ and then collect the attributes afterward. This allows the client to >+ skip issuing GETATTRs in some situations but means that the server >+ is calling vfs_getattr for almost all RPCs. On some filesystems >+ (particularly those that are clustered or networked) this is >expensive >+ and atomicity is difficult to guarantee. This flag indicates to nfsd >+ that it should skip providing WCC attributes to the client in NFSv3 >+ replies when doing operations on this filesystem. Consider enabling >+ this on filesystems that have an expensive ->getattr inode operation, >+ or when atomicity between pre and post operation attribute collection >+ is impossible to guarantee. >diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c >index 01dcd494f781..c30c8c604e2a 100644 >--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c >+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c >@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static __be32 * > encode_post_op_attr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, __be32 *p, struct svc_fh >*fhp) > { > struct dentry *dentry = fhp->fh_dentry; >- if (dentry && d_really_is_positive(dentry)) { >+ if (!fhp->fh_no_wcc && dentry && d_really_is_positive(dentry)) { > __be32 err; > struct kstat stat; > >@@ -256,6 +256,9 @@ void fill_post_wcc(struct svc_fh *fhp) > { > __be32 err; > >+ if (fhp->fh_no_wcc) >+ return; >+ > if (fhp->fh_post_saved) > printk("nfsd: inode locked twice during operation.\n"); > >diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c >index 350041a40fe5..29ae37f62b9b 100644 >--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c >+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c >@@ -267,6 +267,16 @@ static __be32 nfsd_set_fh_dentry(struct svc_rqst >*rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp) > > fhp->fh_dentry = dentry; > fhp->fh_export = exp; >+ >+ switch (rqstp->rq_vers) { >+ case 3: >+ if (!(dentry->d_sb->s_export_op->flags & EXPORT_OP_NOWCC)) >+ break; >+ /* Fallthrough */ >+ case 2: >+ fhp->fh_no_wcc = true; >+ } >+ > return 0; > out: > exp_put(exp); >@@ -535,6 +545,9 @@ fh_compose(struct svc_fh *fhp, struct svc_export >*exp, struct dentry *dentry, > */ > set_version_and_fsid_type(fhp, exp, ref_fh); > >+ /* If we have a ref_fh, then copy the fh_no_wcc setting from it. */ >+ fhp->fh_no_wcc = ref_fh ? ref_fh->fh_no_wcc : false; >+ > if (ref_fh == fhp) > fh_put(ref_fh); > >@@ -641,6 +654,7 @@ fh_put(struct svc_fh *fhp) > exp_put(exp); > fhp->fh_export = NULL; > } >+ fhp->fh_no_wcc = false; > return; > } > >diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h >index 1e90dad4926b..9ddead4d98f8 100644 >--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h >+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h >@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ typedef struct svc_fh { > > unsigned char fh_locked; /* inode locked by us */ > unsigned char fh_want_write; /* remount protection taken */ >+ bool fh_no_wcc; /* no wcc data needed */ This increases the size of svc_fh because it splits the four unsigned chars. You could change all of these (fh_locked, fh_want_write, fh_{pre,post}saved) to be bools to avoid that and make it more clear they are only used as booleans (I verified that they all are only assigned 0 or 1). Cheers, Andreas > > #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_V3 > unsigned char fh_post_saved; /* post-op attrs saved */ >@@ -51,7 +52,6 @@ typedef struct svc_fh { > struct kstat fh_post_attr; /* full attrs after operation */ > u64 fh_post_change; /* nfsv4 change; see above */ > #endif /* CONFIG_NFSD_V3 */ >- > } svc_fh; > > enum nfsd_fsid { >@@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ fill_pre_wcc(struct svc_fh *fhp) > { > struct inode *inode; > >+ if (fhp->fh_no_wcc) >+ return; >+ > inode = d_inode(fhp->fh_dentry); > if (!fhp->fh_pre_saved) { > fhp->fh_pre_mtime = inode->i_mtime; >diff --git a/include/linux/exportfs.h b/include/linux/exportfs.h >index fa05e04c5531..600c3fccc999 100644 >--- a/include/linux/exportfs.h >+++ b/include/linux/exportfs.h >@@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ struct export_operations { > bool write, u32 *device_generation); > int (*commit_blocks)(struct inode *inode, struct iomap *iomaps, > int nr_iomaps, struct iattr *iattr); >+#define EXPORT_OP_NOWCC (0x1) /* Don't collect wcc data for NFSv3 >replies */ >+ unsigned long flags; > }; > > extern int exportfs_encode_inode_fh(struct inode *inode, struct fid *fid, >-- >2.4.3 > >_______________________________________________ >HPDD-discuss mailing list >HPDD-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss > Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Software Architect Intel High Performance Data Division -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html