On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:04 PM, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 20, 2015, at 9:59 PM, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If the ctime or mtime or change attribute have changed because
>>>> of an operation we initiated, we should make sure that we force
>>>> an attribute update. However we do not want to mark the page cache
>>>> for revalidation.
>>>
>>> I've tested your linux-next branch (tip is aebbe9d73169
>>> ("NFS41/flexfiles: zero out DS write wcc") against Solaris 12
>>> with write delegation enabled (over RDMA, even!).
>>>
>>> I was not able to reproduce the write append failures I saw
>>> before.
>>>
>>
>> Perfect. Thanks for testing!
>
> Would it be possible to label some of these for stable?
>
I think this one is the only one that is missing such a label. I've
reworded the commit message and pushed out a revised patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
