On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 06:56:18PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > I think we need to keep that check there (or something like it), even if > just to future-proof this code. But, I am open to suggestions on ways to > make the static checker happy. > Eventually (and not too far into the future actually) I will fix Smatch so that it knows that the callers never use size more than SIMPLE_TRANSACTION_LIMIT so it won't print this error. So I guess we can keep the check. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
