On Jul10 07:24, Jeff Layton wrote: > Huh. I'm stumped... > > These patches are pretty straightforward. We're just taking an extra > reference to the filp when running lock operations so that it doesn't > disappear before the replies can be processed (typically in the event > that a signal comes in while waiting on the reply). Given the odd stack > trace above, I have to wonder if there's some sort of memory scribble > going on. I also forgot to mention that I also had the following messgae before the trace: VFS: Close: file count is 0 -- William
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
