Re: extra reference to fl->fl_file, possible regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul10 07:24, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Huh. I'm stumped...
> 
> These patches are pretty straightforward. We're just taking an extra
> reference to the filp when running lock operations so that it doesn't
> disappear before the replies can be processed (typically in the event
> that a signal comes in while waiting on the reply). Given the odd stack
> trace above, I have to wonder if there's some sort of memory scribble
> going on.

I also forgot to mention that I also had the following messgae before
the trace:

VFS: Close: file count is 0

-- 
William

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux