Re: [PATCH] nfs: take extra reference to fl->fl_file when running a LOCKU operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:12:30 -0400
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Jean reported another crash, similar to the one fixed by feaff8e5b2cf:
> 
>     BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000148
>     IP: [<ffffffff8124ef7f>] locks_get_lock_context+0xf/0xa0
>     PGD 0
>     Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>     Modules linked in: nfsv3 nfs_layout_flexfiles rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs fscache vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock cfg80211 rfkill coretemp crct10dif_pclmul ppdev vmw_balloon crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel pcspkr vmxnet3 parport_pc i2c_piix4 microcode serio_raw parport nfsd floppy vmw_vmci acpi_cpufreq auth_rpcgss shpchp nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc vmwgfx drm_kms_helper ttm drm mptspi scsi_transport_spi mptscsih ata_generic mptbase i2c_core pata_acpi
>     CPU: 0 PID: 329 Comm: kworker/0:1H Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7+ #2
>     Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 07/30/2013
>     Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
>     30ec000
>     RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8124ef7f>]  [<ffffffff8124ef7f>] locks_get_lock_context+0xf/0xa0
>     RSP: 0018:ffff8802330efc08  EFLAGS: 00010296
>     RAX: ffff8802330efc58 RBX: ffff880097187c80 RCX: 0000000000000000
>     RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 0000000000000000
>     RBP: ffff8802330efc18 R08: ffff88023fc173d8 R09: 3038b7bf00000000
>     R10: 00002f1a02000000 R11: 3038b7bf00000000 R12: 0000000000000000
>     R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8802337a2300 R15: 0000000000000020
>     FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88023fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>     CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>     CR2: 0000000000000148 CR3: 000000003680f000 CR4: 00000000001407f0
>     Stack:
>      ffff880097187c80 ffff880097187cd8 ffff8802330efc98 ffffffff81250281
>      ffff8802330efc68 ffffffffa013e7df ffff8802330efc98 0000000000000246
>      ffff8801f6901c00 ffff880233d2b8d8 ffff8802330efc58 ffff8802330efc58
>     Call Trace:
>      [<ffffffff81250281>] __posix_lock_file+0x31/0x5e0
>      [<ffffffffa013e7df>] ? rpc_wake_up_task_queue_locked.part.35+0xcf/0x240 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffff8125088b>] posix_lock_file_wait+0x3b/0xd0
>      [<ffffffffa03890b2>] ? nfs41_wake_and_assign_slot+0x32/0x40 [nfsv4]
>      [<ffffffffa0365808>] ? nfs41_sequence_done+0xd8/0x300 [nfsv4]
>      [<ffffffffa0367525>] do_vfs_lock+0x35/0x40 [nfsv4]
>      [<ffffffffa03690c1>] nfs4_locku_done+0x81/0x120 [nfsv4]
>      [<ffffffffa013e310>] ? rpc_destroy_wait_queue+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffffa013e310>] ? rpc_destroy_wait_queue+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffffa013e33c>] rpc_exit_task+0x2c/0x90 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffffa0134400>] ? call_refreshresult+0x170/0x170 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffffa013ece4>] __rpc_execute+0x84/0x410 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffffa013f085>] rpc_async_schedule+0x15/0x20 [sunrpc]
>      [<ffffffff810add67>] process_one_work+0x147/0x400
>      [<ffffffff810ae42b>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x460
>      [<ffffffff810ae310>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2f0/0x2f0
>      [<ffffffff810b35d9>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
>      [<ffffffff81010000>] ? perf_trace_xen_mmu_set_pmd+0xa0/0x160
>      [<ffffffff810b3510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
>      [<ffffffff8173c222>] ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70
>      [<ffffffff810b3510>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
>     Code: a5 81 e8 85 75 e4 ff c6 05 31 ee aa 00 01 eb 98 66 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 54 49 89 fc 53 <48> 8b 9f 48 01 00 00 48 85 db 74 08 48 89 d8 5b 41 5c 5d c3 83
>     RIP  [<ffffffff8124ef7f>] locks_get_lock_context+0xf/0xa0
>      RSP <ffff8802330efc08>
>     CR2: 0000000000000148
>     ---[ end trace 64484f16250de7ef ]---
> 
> The problem is almost exactly the same as the one fixed by feaff8e5b2cf.
> We must take a reference to the struct file when running the LOCKU
> compound to prevent the final fput from running until the operation is
> complete.
> 
> Reported-by: Jean Spector <jean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 605c203de556..5e7638d8e31b 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -5484,6 +5484,7 @@ static struct nfs4_unlockdata *nfs4_alloc_unlockdata(struct file_lock *fl,
>  	atomic_inc(&lsp->ls_count);
>  	/* Ensure we don't close file until we're done freeing locks! */
>  	p->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(ctx);
> +	get_file(fl->fl_file);
>  	memcpy(&p->fl, fl, sizeof(p->fl));
>  	p->server = NFS_SERVER(inode);
>  	return p;
> @@ -5495,6 +5496,7 @@ static void nfs4_locku_release_calldata(void *data)
>  	nfs_free_seqid(calldata->arg.seqid);
>  	nfs4_put_lock_state(calldata->lsp);
>  	put_nfs_open_context(calldata->ctx);
> +	fput(calldata->fl.fl_file);
>  	kfree(calldata);
>  }
>  

Oops, I forgot to Cc stable on this one...

Trond, can you add that?

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux