On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 20:37:45 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is it causing any other damage than the rkhunter warning you reported? > > Well, not that I know of. Are you sure that this port will be > reconnected, and is not just a leak. Not sure if you could waste more > ports this way with connections to other machines. I only have my > wife's box connect to this server. This server is actually a client to > my other boxes. > > Although the rkhunter warning is the only thing that triggers, I still > would think this is a stable fix, especially if the port is leaked and > not taken again. I did some experiments. If I unmount the directories from my wife's machine and remount them, the port that was hidden is fully closed. Maybe it's not that big of a deal after all. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
