Hello, Petr.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:01:01PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> +static int kthread_iterant_fn(void *kti_ptr)
> +{
> + struct kthread_iterant *kti = kti_ptr;
> + void *data = kti->data;
> +
> + if (kti->init)
> + kti->init(data);
> +
> + do {
> + if (kti->func)
> + kti->func(data);
Is supporting kthread_iterant w/o the body function intentional? If
so, did you have anything specific on mind for it? I don't think it
matters either way. Just curious how this came to be.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
