On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 12:01 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Just to be sure. Do you suggest to use TASK_IDLE everywhere in > kthreads or only when the uninterruptible sleep is really needed? Always, only use INTERRUPTIBLE when you're actually interruptible, that is you want signals or such muck to terminate your wait. > IMHO, we should not use TASK_IDLE in freezable kthreads because > it would break freezing. How so? The task is IDLE, its not doing anything. > Well, we could freezable_schedule() but only > on locations where it is safe to get freezed. Anyway, we need to > be careful here. s/freezed/frozen/ Bah, you made me look at the freezer code, karma reduction for you. And this is the arch typical freeze point if ever there was one, you're checking kthread_stop, if we can terminate the kthread, we can certainly get frozen. > BTW: What is the preferred way of freezing, please? Is it better > to end up in the fridge or is it fine to call freezer_do_not_count(); > or set PF_NOFREEZE when it is safe? freezable_schedule() is fine in this case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
