On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 04:27:25PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > I wonder if we could instead skip the fh_verify's inode_permission call > entirely? Most callers of fh_verify don't need the inode_permission > call at all as far as I can tell, because the following vfs operation > does permission checking already. In case of notify_change() we only pass a dentry, so anything mount-dependent must be done in callers... Actually, I wonder how does tomoyo and its ilk interact with nfsd? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
