On 04 Jun 17:23, Chuck Lever wrote: > > This just happened during a kernel panic of our nfs server which stayed > > down for a while, then only a dozen machines could not recover, the rest > > was fine. So it is definitely not that easy to trigger. > > > > So far all my attempts to reproduce this have failed. I tried mostly by > > setting iptables to send RSTs back to the server randomly using iptables > > and dropping syns pretty often. If you have any suggestions, that'd be > > great > > Is there a workload running on that mount point? It probably shouldn't > be idle when you try your experiment. I was just running ls -l on some dir. I could do some writes with dd. The mount point that "froze" was lightly used and mostly for writes > > Do you have any thoughts about my impression that there could be race > > between cancelling the callback in xs_close() that could leave > > XPRT_CONNECTING on? > > I agree that XPRT_CONNECTING is probably the source of the issue. > > But xs_tcp_close() can be called directly by autoclose (not likely if > there are pending RPCs) or transport shutdown (also not likely, same > reason). I'm skeptical there's a race involving xs_close(). > > I'm wondering if there was a missing state change upcall, or the state > change upcall happened and xs_tcp_cancal_linger_timeout() exited > without clearing XPRT_CONNECTING. I am 100% sure that XPRT_CONNECTING is the issue because 1) the state had the flag up 2) there was absolutley no nfs network traffic between the client and the server 3) I "unfroze" the mounts by clearing it manually. xs_tcp_cancel_linger_timeout, I think, is guaranteed to clear the flag. Either the callback is canceled and it clears the flag or the callback will do it. I am not sure how this could leave the flag set but I am not familiar with this code, so I could totally be missing something obvious. xs_tcp_close() is the only thing I have found which cancels the callback and does not clear the flag. > It's rather academic, though. All this code was replaced in 4.0. Well, it's not academic for all the users of the stable branches which might have this bug in the kernel they're running :-) If I can reproduce this issue, I will happily test 4.0. Guillaume. -- Guillaume Morin <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
