On 5/4/2015 8:57 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
Clean up: Instead of carrying a pointer to the buffer pool and
the rpc_xprt, carry a pointer to the controlling rpcrdma_xprt.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c | 4 ++--
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c | 7 ++-----
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c | 8 +++++---
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h | 3 +--
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
index 2c53ea9..98a3b95 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
@@ -732,8 +732,8 @@ rpcrdma_reply_handler(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
struct rpcrdma_msg *headerp;
struct rpcrdma_req *req;
struct rpc_rqst *rqst;
- struct rpc_xprt *xprt = rep->rr_xprt;
- struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = rpcx_to_rdmax(xprt);
+ struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt = rep->rr_rxprt;
+ struct rpc_xprt *xprt = &r_xprt->rx_xprt;
__be32 *iptr;
int rdmalen, status;
unsigned long cwnd;
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
index fdcb2c7..ed70551 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
@@ -650,12 +650,9 @@ xprt_rdma_send_request(struct rpc_task *task)
if (req->rl_reply == NULL) /* e.g. reconnection */
rpcrdma_recv_buffer_get(req);
-
- if (req->rl_reply) {
+ /* rpcrdma_recv_buffer_get may have set rl_reply, so check again */
+ if (req->rl_reply)
req->rl_reply->rr_func = rpcrdma_reply_handler;
- /* this need only be done once, but... */
- req->rl_reply->rr_xprt = xprt;
- }
Can't you just fold that into rpcrdma_recv_buffer_get() instead of
checking what it did?
Other than that,
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
