Re: [PATCH v1 01/14] xprtrdma: Transport fault injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/2015 09:53 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
> On May 5, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> Neat idea!  Are servers able to handle client recovery without getting too confused?
> 
> So far I have encountered only issues on the client side. I think this
> is because the client is the active part of re-establishing transport
> connections. In addition, RPC/RDMA clients have a bunch of resources
> that need to be reset after a transport disconnect.
> 
> I think this idea can be translated into something that can be done
> in the generic layer (ie, xprt.c) if people think that would be of
> benefit for testing TCP also.

It might, and now is the time to discuss it before we're stuck maintaining multiple interfaces to the same thing.

Another thought:  can you move this under debugfs instead of proc?  That's where the other kernel fault injection controls are, and it might give us a little more flexibility if we need to change the interface later.

Anna
> 
> 
>> Anna
>>
>> On 05/04/2015 01:56 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> It has been exceptionally useful to exercise the logic that handles
>>> local immediate errors and RDMA connection loss.  To enable
>>> developers to test this regularly and repeatably, add logic to
>>> simulate connection loss every so often.
>>>
>>> Fault injection is disabled by default. It is enabled with
>>>
>>>  $ sudo echo xxx > /proc/sys/sunrpc/rdma_inject_transport_fault
>>>
>>> where "xxx" is a large positive number of transport method calls
>>> before a disconnect. A value of several thousand is usually a good
>>> number that allows reasonable forward progress while still causing a
>>> lot of connection drops.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> net/sunrpc/Kconfig              |   12 ++++++++++++
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h |    1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/Kconfig b/net/sunrpc/Kconfig
>>> index 9068e72..329f82c 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -61,6 +61,18 @@ config SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_CLIENT
>>>
>>> 	  If unsure, say N.
>>>
>>> +config SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_FAULT_INJECTION
>>> +	bool "RPC over RDMA client fault injection"
>>> +	depends on SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_CLIENT
>>> +	default N
>>> +	help
>>> +	  This option enables fault injection in the xprtrdma module.
>>> +	  Fault injection is disabled by default. It is enabled with:
>>> +
>>> +	    $ sudo echo xxx > /proc/sys/sunrpc/rdma_inject_fault
>>> +
>>> +	  If unsure, say N.
>>> +
>>> config SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER
>>> 	tristate "RPC over RDMA Server Support"
>>> 	depends on SUNRPC && INFINIBAND && INFINIBAND_ADDR_TRANS
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
>>> index 54f23b1..fdcb2c7 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/transport.c
>>> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static unsigned int xprt_rdma_max_inline_write = RPCRDMA_DEF_INLINE;
>>> static unsigned int xprt_rdma_inline_write_padding;
>>> static unsigned int xprt_rdma_memreg_strategy = RPCRDMA_FRMR;
>>> 		int xprt_rdma_pad_optimize = 1;
>>> +static unsigned int xprt_rdma_inject_transport_fault;
>>>
>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
>>>
>>> @@ -135,6 +136,13 @@ static struct ctl_table xr_tunables_table[] = {
>>> 		.mode		= 0644,
>>> 		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
>>> 	},
>>> +	{
>>> +		.procname	= "rdma_inject_transport_fault",
>>> +		.data		= &xprt_rdma_inject_transport_fault,
>>> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
>>> +		.mode		= 0644,
>>> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
>>> +	},
>>> 	{ },
>>> };
>>>
>>> @@ -246,6 +254,27 @@ xprt_rdma_connect_worker(struct work_struct *work)
>>> 	xprt_clear_connecting(xprt);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#if defined CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_FAULT_INJECTION
>>> +static void
>>> +xprt_rdma_inject_disconnect(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (!xprt_rdma_inject_transport_fault)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	if (atomic_dec_return(&r_xprt->rx_inject_count) == 0) {
>>> +		atomic_set(&r_xprt->rx_inject_count,
>>> +			   xprt_rdma_inject_transport_fault);
>>> +		pr_info("rpcrdma: injecting transport disconnect\n");
>>> +		(void)rdma_disconnect(r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_id);
>>> +	}
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static void
>>> +xprt_rdma_inject_disconnect(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /*
>>>  * xprt_rdma_destroy
>>>  *
>>> @@ -405,6 +434,8 @@ xprt_setup_rdma(struct xprt_create *args)
>>> 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&new_xprt->rx_connect_worker,
>>> 			  xprt_rdma_connect_worker);
>>>
>>> +	atomic_set(&new_xprt->rx_inject_count,
>>> +		   xprt_rdma_inject_transport_fault);
>>> 	xprt_rdma_format_addresses(xprt);
>>> 	xprt->max_payload = new_xprt->rx_ia.ri_ops->ro_maxpages(new_xprt);
>>> 	if (xprt->max_payload == 0)
>>> @@ -515,6 +546,7 @@ xprt_rdma_allocate(struct rpc_task *task, size_t size)
>>> out:
>>> 	dprintk("RPC:       %s: size %zd, request 0x%p\n", __func__, size, req);
>>> 	req->rl_connect_cookie = 0;	/* our reserved value */
>>> +	xprt_rdma_inject_disconnect(r_xprt);
>>> 	return req->rl_sendbuf->rg_base;
>>>
>>> out_rdmabuf:
>>> @@ -589,6 +621,7 @@ xprt_rdma_free(void *buffer)
>>> 	}
>>>
>>> 	rpcrdma_buffer_put(req);
>>> +	xprt_rdma_inject_disconnect(r_xprt);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -634,6 +667,7 @@ xprt_rdma_send_request(struct rpc_task *task)
>>>
>>> 	rqst->rq_xmit_bytes_sent += rqst->rq_snd_buf.len;
>>> 	rqst->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
>>> +	xprt_rdma_inject_disconnect(r_xprt);
>>> 	return 0;
>>>
>>> failed_marshal:
>>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> index 78e0b8b..08aee53 100644
>>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/xprt_rdma.h
>>> @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ struct rpcrdma_xprt {
>>> 	struct rpcrdma_create_data_internal rx_data;
>>> 	struct delayed_work	rx_connect_worker;
>>> 	struct rpcrdma_stats	rx_stats;
>>> +	atomic_t		rx_inject_count;
>>> };
>>>
>>> #define rpcx_to_rdmax(x) container_of(x, struct rpcrdma_xprt, rx_xprt)
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> Chuck Lever
> chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux