On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:03:53PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > I'm ok with a cc to stable, but it's a bit borderline. Note that currently > > > you even applied my two patches to your 4.2 incoming queue, not even 4.1.. > > > > Yeah, those -incoming branches are random works-in-progress and will get > > rebased frequently, I'll move the other to for-4.1 and leave this one > > for 4.2. > > I would prefer if we could queue it up for 4.1 if possible. > The main reason why you may want these patches is that without return-on-close, you typically can end up with layouts being cached in knfsd without the filesystem being pinned. When you then unmount the filesystem... Cheers Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
