Re: [PATCH RFC] NFSD: fix cannot umounting mount points under pseudo root

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:50:31PM +0800, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> If there are some mount points(not exported for nfs) under
> a pseudo root, after client's operation of those entry under
> the root, anyone can unmount those mount points until nfsd stop.
> 
> # cat /etc/exports
> /nfs/xfs        *(rw,insecure,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash)
> /nfs/pnfs       *(rw,insecure,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash)
> # ll /nfs/
> total 0
> drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 84 Apr 21 22:27 pnfs
> drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 84 Apr 21 22:27 test
> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root  6 Apr 20 22:01 xfs
> # mount /dev/sde /nfs/test
> # df
> Filesystem                      1K-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on
> ......
> /dev/sdd                          1038336   32944   1005392   4% /nfs/pnfs
> /dev/sdc                         10475520   32928  10442592   1% /nfs/xfs
> /dev/sde                           999320    1284    929224   1% /nfs/test
> # mount -t nfs 127.0.0.1:/nfs/ /mnt
> # ll /mnt/*/
> /mnt/pnfs/:
> total 0
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 0 Apr 21 22:23 attr
> drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 6 Apr 21 22:19 tmp
> 
> /mnt/xfs/:
> total 0
> # umount /nfs/test/
> umount: /nfs/test/: target is busy
>         (In some cases useful info about processes that
>          use the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1).)
> 
> I don't think that's user expect, they want umount /nfs/test/.

I agree that this is annoying.

> It's caused by exports cache of nfsd holds the reference of
> the path (here is /nfs/test/), so, it can't umounted until nfsd stop.

A cache flush (exportfs -f) should also do the job, as long as you
then manage to unmount before the cache entry is re-added.  (So I
suppose if you wanted to be completely safe:

	exportfs -f
	killall -STOP  rpc.mountd
	umount /nfs/test/
	killall -CONT rpc.mountd
)

> There is one strange thing exist, the export cache status of
> /nfs/test/ is CACHE_NEGATIVE, also hold the reference of the path.
> I think nfsd should not hold the reference when CACHE_NEGATIVE.
> 
> I can't find a better way to put the reference, just path it after
> svc_export_update().

Unfortunately ex_path is part of the key--it's what we need to do
lookups in this cache.  I'm surprised something like ls /mnt/ still
works after this.

I'm not sure what to do.  I wonder if we really need the struct path as
part of the key, or if we could get away with just a string path?
That's what we're actually passing to userspace, after all.

--b.

> 
> Any comments are welcome, thanks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfsd/export.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.c b/fs/nfsd/export.c
> index c3e3b6e..5595cffc7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/export.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/export.c
> @@ -793,9 +793,15 @@ svc_export_update(struct svc_export *new, struct svc_export *old)
>  	int hash = svc_export_hash(old);
>  
>  	ch = sunrpc_cache_update(old->cd, &new->h, &old->h, hash);
> -	if (ch)
> -		return container_of(ch, struct svc_export, h);
> -	else
> +	if (ch) {
> +		struct svc_export *exp = container_of(ch, struct svc_export, h);
> +		if (test_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &exp->h.flags)) {
> +			path_put(&exp->ex_path);
> +			exp->ex_path.mnt = NULL;
> +			exp->ex_path.dentry = NULL;
> +		}
> +		return exp;
> +	} else
>  		return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.3.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux