On 04/08/2015 01:38 PM, Tom Talpey wrote: > On 4/7/2015 8:25 AM, Michael Wang wrote: >> Mapping List: >> node-type link-layer old-transport new-transport >> nes RNIC ETH IWARP IWARP >> amso1100 RNIC ETH IWARP IWARP >> cxgb3 RNIC ETH IWARP IWARP >> cxgb4 RNIC ETH IWARP IWARP >> usnic USNIC_UDP ETH USNIC_UDP USNIC_UDP >> ocrdma IB_CA ETH IB IBOE >> mlx4 IB_CA IB/ETH IB IB/IBOE >> mlx5 IB_CA IB IB IB >> ehca IB_CA IB IB IB >> ipath IB_CA IB IB IB >> mthca IB_CA IB IB IB >> qib IB_CA IB IB IB > > Can I rewind to ask a high-level question - what's the testing > plan for all of this? Do you have folks lined up for verifying > each of these adapters/networks, and what tests will they run? I think no one can have the access to all these hardware, so we can only depends on those who accidentally have one to help the testing, but it's still far from that stage.. Besides, the logical is not very complex in this part, all the mapping could find corresponding code as proof, so reviewing carefully then give a public testing on some tree may could be a plan too? But yes, I won't be able to give an exhaustive testing by myself and no one is backing me on that currently :-P me too are waiting for the answers on how to assure the quality for patch set like this... Regards, Michael Wang > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
