Ooops, looks like a debug printk sneaked in, here is the proper version:
---
>From fd2478671133693f8d2c952649bcd79293394972 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:31:48 +0200
Subject: nfsd: add NFSEXP_PNFS to the exflags array
And add a comment to export.h to remind people they have to do this.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
fs/nfsd/export.c | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/nfsd/export.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/export.c b/fs/nfsd/export.c
index c3e3b6e..639d8c2 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/export.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/export.c
@@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ static struct flags {
{ NFSEXP_NOSUBTREECHECK, {"no_subtree_check", ""}},
{ NFSEXP_NOAUTHNLM, {"insecure_locks", ""}},
{ NFSEXP_V4ROOT, {"v4root", ""}},
+ { NFSEXP_PNFS, {"pnfs", ""}},
{ 0, {"", ""}}
};
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/nfsd/export.h b/include/uapi/linux/nfsd/export.h
index d3bd6ffe..0df7bd5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/nfsd/export.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/nfsd/export.h
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
/*
* Export flags.
+ *
+ * Please update the expflags[] array in fs/nfsd/export.c when adding
+ * a new flag.
*/
#define NFSEXP_READONLY 0x0001
#define NFSEXP_INSECURE_PORT 0x0002
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
