On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 05:17:41PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > Test | v4.1 | no READ_PLUS | READ_PLUS > --------------------------------------------------- > generic/013 | 135s | 143s | 123s > generic/075 | 4s | 11s | 4s > generic/091 | 9s | 16s | 15s > generic/112 | 4s | 7s | 6s > generic/127 | 62s | 117s | 114s > generic/213 | [not run] | 1s | 1s > generic/214 | [not run] | 0s | 0s > generic/228 | [not run] | 1s | 2s > generic/236 | 1s | 1s | 1s > generic/263 | 4s | 6s | 8s > generic/285 | 0s | 1s | 3s > generic/315 | [not run] | 2s | 1s > --------------------------------------------------- > Total | 3:47.47 | 5:11.85 | 4:43.77 So why is 4.2 generally slower than 4.1? I guess we really should look into that first. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
