Re: buggy CLOSE in the "testing" branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Trond Myklebust
>>>> <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Olga,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm experiencing that CLOSE uses a delegation stateid instead of the
>>>>>> open stateid which I think is what the spec says. Server replies with
>>>>>> BAD_STATEID.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this a bug or did I misread the spec? Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be a client bug. Do you have a reproducer?
>>>>
>>>> Yep. Just cat a (2nd) file after mount (i.e.., a file needs to have a
>>>> delegation). A CLOSE will use a delegation stateid. Problem is seenl
>>>> on the network trace. It will also leads to failure on unmount with
>>>> CLIENTID_BUSY because there is still an open state that client never
>>>> released. Please note that both "cat" and "unmount" will "succeed"
>>>> from the user's perspective. Thus, unless testing also looks at the
>>>> network trace, this failure will never be caught.
>>>
>>> Anna pointed me at the commit 566fcec60. It seems to be that's what
>>> broke it as it removed the use of openstateid for the stateid arg. But
>>> I really don't understand the necessity of the patch. CLOSE must
>>> always use the openstateid. Therefore it doesn't need to worry that
>>> stateid is changed from openstateid to delegation stateid or locking
>>> stateid. It should just use the openstateid as it did before.
>>>
>>
>> Doh! Yes, the change to ->stateid is wrong. I must have been on borken
>> autopilot...
>>
>> The reason for the patch itself is to ensure the seqid hasn't changed.
>> It has nothing to do with delegation stateids or locking.
>> Can either one of you please send a patch to fix up 566fcec60? Please
>> note that we also need to change the comparison in nfs4_close_done to
>> match the copy in nfs4_close_prepare.
>>
>
> Something like works (btw this is on top of nfs-for-next which also
> has that problem):
>
> After 566fcec60 the client uses the "current stateid" from the
> nfs4_state structure to close a file.  This could potentially contain a
> delegation stateid, which is disallowed by the protocol and causes
> servers to return NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID.  This patch restores the
> (correct) behavior of sending the open stateid to close a file.
>
> Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 566fcec60 (NFSv4: Fix an atomicity problem in CLOSE)
> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index a211daf..732526e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -2655,7 +2655,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *d
>                 case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
>                 case -NFS4ERR_EXPIRED:
>                         if (!nfs4_stateid_match(&calldata->arg.stateid,
> -                                               &state->stateid)) {
> +                                               &state->open_stateid)) {
>                                 rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
>                                 goto out_release;
>                         }
> @@ -2691,7 +2691,7 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void
>         is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>         is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>         is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
> -       nfs4_stateid_copy(&calldata->arg.stateid, &state->stateid);
> +       nfs4_stateid_copy(&calldata->arg.stateid, &state->open_stateid);
>         /* Calculate the change in open mode */
>         calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
>         if (state->n_rdwr == 0) {
>> --
>> Trond Myklebust
>> Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
>> trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks! I'm applying this.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux