Re: [PATCH 39/50] nfs/flexfiles: send layoutreturn before freeing lseg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/16/2014 05:02 PM, Tom Haynes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:12:00PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
>> On 12/16/2014 02:01 PM, Tom Haynes wrote:
>>> From: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Otherwise we'll lose error tracking information when
>>> encoding layoutreturn.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <tao.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Haynes <loghyr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> index e123cfc..35465cb 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
>>> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ pnfs_layout_need_return(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
>>>  		return false;
>>>  
>>>  	list_for_each_entry(s, &lo->plh_segs, pls_list)
>>> -		if (test_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN, &lseg->pls_flags))
>>> +		if (s != lseg && test_bit(NFS_LSEG_LAYOUTRETURN, &s->pls_flags))
>>>  			return false;
>>>  
>>>  	*stateid = lo->plh_stateid;
>>> @@ -386,15 +386,22 @@ pnfs_put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
>>>  		enum pnfs_iomode iomode;
>>>  
>>>  		pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> -		pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>>>  		need_return = pnfs_layout_need_return(lo, lseg,
>>>  						      &stateid, &iomode);
>>> -		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> -		pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>>> -		if (need_return)
>>> +		if (need_return) {
>>> +			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> +			/* hdr reference dropped in nfs4_layoutreturn_release */
>>>  			pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, stateid, iomode);
>>> -		else
>>> +			spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> +			pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>>> +			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> +			pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>>> +		} else {
>>> +			pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(lo, lseg);
>>> +			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>>> +			pnfs_free_lseg(lseg);
>>>  			pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
>>> +		}
>>
>> Is there a way to rephrase this so we're not using every other line to either lock or unlock?
> 
> Hi Anna,
> 
> This patch:
> 
> [PATCH 46/50] nfs/flexfiles: defer sending layoutreturn in pnfs_put_lseg
> 
> does do just that.
> 
> I could look at consolidating the two patches such that we don't see this ugliness.

Please do!

Anna

> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
>>
>> Anna
>>
>>>  	}
>>>  }
>>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_put_lseg);
>>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux