Hi Andy On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:33 PM, <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Otherwise rpc.gssd will send a V4 NULL RPCSEC_GSS_INIT call with an RPCSEC_GSS > service of rpc_gss_svc_none for rpc_sec_gss_svc_integrity/privacy requests > from the kernel. I thought this behaviour of using rpc_gss_svc_none for the RPCSEC_GSS negotiation in userland and then "stepping up" to a stricter service in the kernel had been declared legal by the powers that be. What is the concern about doing so? Cheers, Trond -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html