Re: [PATCH 00/19] gssd improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-12-09 22:13, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 12/09/2014 03:22 PM, David Härdeman wrote:
Agreed. Though I believe regressions would be noticed rather
quickly...and the ensuing screams would be rather loud? I might be
mistaken though...

Yeah... They will be screaming at me! not you... 8-)

Heh, yeah, but my point was rather that any problem will (hopefully) be spotted and reported rather quickly.

Finally, why the "change dnotify to inotify" a good thing?

I was mostly referring to the EINTR thing...since dnotify is signal based, there are a lot of functions that should be checked for EINTR and restarted. Maybe they should anyway, but the need is less urgent with inotify (the other advantages were the reduced number of fds and not having to rescan the while rpc_pipefs hierarchy on every change).


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux