On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 15:47:09 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:24:18PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/Kconfig b/net/sunrpc/Kconfig > > index fb78117b896c..08e01949bdc5 100644 > > --- a/net/sunrpc/Kconfig > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/Kconfig > > @@ -71,3 +71,13 @@ config SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA_SERVER > > choose M here: the module will be called svcrdma. > > > > If unsure, say N. > > + > > +config SUNRPC_SVC_WORKQUEUE > > + bool "Support for workqueue-based SUNRPC services" > > + depends on SUNRPC > > + default n > > + help > > + Traditional SUNRPC services have required a dedicated thread > > + to handle incoming requests. This option enables support for > > + queueing incoming reqests to a workqueue instead, eliminating > > + the need for a dedicated thread pool. > > Minor point, but: If people don't want this, they can turn it off at > runtime. It's annoying to test all the possible combination of build > options, and this doesn't seem likely to let people e.g. build a > significantly smaller kernel, so I wouldn't bother. > > --b. Ok, fair enough. I added the config option since this was experimental, but if we keep it runtime-switchable then I think you're probably right and there's no need. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
