On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 09:17:44AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote: > On 11/19/2014 04:59 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:37:58 -0500 > > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > >>> Patch #1 in this series is a bugfix, but probably isn't worth sending to > >>> stable. The rest are just cleanups in preparation for some other patches > >>> that I have queued up. Can you consider these for 3.19? > >> Sure, I've read through them, they look fine. > >> > >> When I tried to apply them to my for-3.19 there were rejects due to > >> tracing stuff in include/trace/events/sunrpc.h. I haven't tried to > >> investigate yet. > >> > >> --b. > >> > > Ahh yeah. These are based on top of the tracepoint patches I sent to > > Trond a couple of weeks ago. I think he's planning to merge those in > > 3.19 too, but I don't think he's done that yet. Anna may have though... > > I have them in a private tree on my laptop that I use for testing. Want me to push them out somewhere? That'd help me at least test, but we need something more than a temporary testing branch to get ready for the merge window. Choices include: - Trond merges them all now, I pull that and apply these on top. - I merge them instead, or we divide the patches between us somehow. Worst case, it's probably even OK if there's a patch or two that we both apply. In any case we need to get that sorted out now-ish as the merge window's probably starting next week. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
