On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:24:41PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:17:28PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:09:00PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > > On 10/28/2014 05:07 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:00:24PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote: > > > >> I'm testing with xfstests #285. It's an lseek specific test, and helped > > > >> find a few edge cases during development. > > > > > > > > Any hints? I did basically: > > > > > > > > yum install xfsprogs-devel libattr-devel libacl-devel > > > > git clone git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests.git > > > > cd xfstests > > > > make > > > > make install > > > > cat >local.config <<EOF > > > > FSTYP=nfs > > > > TEST_DEV=f20-1:/exports/xfs/xfstests > > > > TEST_DIR=/mnt > > > > NFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS='-overs=4.2,sec=sys' > > > > > > Try setting TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTIONS instead of NFS_MOUNT_OPTIONS. > > > > No change.--b. > > (But TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS works. How was I supposed to figure that out?) OK, now my complaint is #285 is passing but I'm not seeing any SEEKs in the trace. Well, I'll take another look tomorrow.... --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
