On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:05 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > Hi Sir Linus > > A small administrative stuff, was on vacation and the old email bounced on me. > I was hoping to still make the 3 weeks merge window, but it was 2 weeks at the > end. > Your call if to make this wait for next window. Needless to say that it is > ZERO risk, just change of email. > > Based on commit [bfe01a5b] Linux 3.17 > > 3 patches available in the git repository at: > > git://git.open-osd.org/linux-open-osd.git for-linus > > for you to fetch changes up to 1fa3a002b2546c42c343c77c144871285896ced5: > > Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation (2014-10-19 20:36:36 +0300) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Boaz Harrosh (3): > MAINTAINERS: Change Boaz Harrosh's email > Boaz Harrosh - Fix broken email address > Boaz Harrosh - fix email in Documentation > > Documentation/scsi/osd.txt | 3 +-- > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/osd/Kbuild | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/osd/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/osd/osd_debug.h | 2 +- > drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 4 ++-- > fs/exofs/Kbuild | 2 +- > fs/exofs/common.h | 2 +- > fs/exofs/dir.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +- > fs/exofs/file.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/inode.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/namei.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/ore.c | 4 ++-- > fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/ore_raid.h | 2 +- > fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/symlink.c | 2 +- > fs/exofs/sys.c | 2 +- > fs/nfs/objlayout/objio_osd.c | 2 +- > fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.c | 2 +- > fs/nfs/objlayout/objlayout.h | 2 +- > fs/nfs/objlayout/pnfs_osd_xdr_cli.c | 2 +- > include/linux/pnfs_osd_xdr.h | 2 +- > include/scsi/osd_initiator.h | 2 +- > include/scsi/osd_ore.h | 2 +- > include/scsi/osd_protocol.h | 4 ++-- > include/scsi/osd_sec.h | 2 +- > include/scsi/osd_sense.h | 2 +- > include/scsi/osd_types.h | 2 +- > 31 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) This is a bit of an unnecessary massive churn. No one expects the author named in the file to stay up to date, especially because the @domain.com usually credits the company who paid for the code, so it's left in as a kind of mark of respect for them. I'm not saying it applies in your case, just that it creates the common expectation of in-file authors needing to be traced through the MAINTAINERS file. Could you not just update the MAINTAINERS file only, like everyone else? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
