Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: nfs4_state_manager() vs. nfs_server_remove_lists()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is a race between nfs4_state_manager() and
> nfs_server_remove_lists() that happens during a nfsv3 mount.
>
> The v3 mount notices there is already a supper block so
> nfs_server_remove_lists() called which uses the nfs_client_lock
> spin lock to synchronize access to the client list.
>
> At the same time nfs4_state_manager() is running through
> the client list looking for work to do, using the same
> lock. When nfs4_state_manager() wins the race to the
> list, a v3 client pointer is found and not ignored
> properly which causes the panic.
>
> Moving some protocol checks before the state checking
> avoids the panic.
>
> CC: Stable Tree <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4client.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
> index 53e435a..7ff4c02 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4client.c
> @@ -622,6 +622,16 @@ int nfs41_walk_client_list(struct nfs_client *new,
>
>         spin_lock(&nn->nfs_client_lock);
>         list_for_each_entry(pos, &nn->nfs_client_list, cl_share_link) {
> +
> +               if (pos->rpc_ops != new->rpc_ops)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (pos->cl_proto != new->cl_proto)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (pos->cl_minorversion != new->cl_minorversion)
> +                       continue;
> +
>                 /* If "pos" isn't marked ready, we can't trust the
>                  * remaining fields in "pos", especially the client
>                  * ID and serverowner fields.  Wait for CREATE_SESSION
> @@ -647,15 +657,6 @@ int nfs41_walk_client_list(struct nfs_client *new,
>                 if (pos->cl_cons_state != NFS_CS_READY)
>                         continue;
>
> -               if (pos->rpc_ops != new->rpc_ops)
> -                       continue;
> -
> -               if (pos->cl_proto != new->cl_proto)
> -                       continue;
> -
> -               if (pos->cl_minorversion != new->cl_minorversion)
> -                       continue;
> -
>                 if (!nfs4_match_clientids(pos, new))
>                         continue;
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

Don't we need the same fix in nfs40_walk_client_list?

Cheers
  Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust

Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData

trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux